Someone gave Peter’s book a bad review because it didn’t specifically mention cerebellar strokes. I think I know who it was and let me just say – that’s annoying as all hell. I will defend Peter G. Levine to the death. There is NO difference where in the brain your stroke occurred. It’s all brain damage. Saying this lobe, that lobe – NO. Neuroplasticity doesn’t discriminate based on what lobe was damaged. As Peter says in the post I have linked, the same rules apply to strokes in the cerebellum.
Categories: Brain stuff, Recovery, Stroke stuff
mycerebellarstrokerecovery 
You’re killing me, girl. I was a good newspaper-person for 15 years because of my effing curiosity. Some people call me nosy, and they’re right.
I have no idea what that means.
seriously?? it means, “WHO?!?”
Oh lol oops! I’ll email you and tell you who I think it was….
It’s probably the same guy that always comments about cerebellar strokes being different and tells Amy to write a book specifically about cerebellar strokes.
That’s who I think it is. His comments annoy the hell out of me.
If you look at the reviews on Amazon – his name is there with the comment – it is him.
Thank you! I’m so going on Amazon and writing something.
Haha! Barb! I had no idea what you meant either!! Confession. But now it seems completely obvious.
I saw his post too, and was happy he clarified the information for me. I didn’t know.
Anybody that gives Peter’s book a bad review just doesn’t get it!
I agree.